THE EMPATHY QUOTIENT (EQ)

Recently, during one of my Emotional Intelligence classes, I read about The Empathy Quotient (EQ), which is an assessment tool created to measure empathy levels in adults. What an amazing tool. This is something so many people that have to be involved in politics or high level management positions or even the military should take.  Even more than once. Why? Because of how much their actions and decision making affects everyone in society. If such people were truly aware of their own humanity, of their own feelings and caring toward others, then maybe a lot, if not most, of our ecological, environmental, human problems would probably not exist.

Here is the link if you are interested in taking it yourself.

https://psychology-tools.com/test/empathy-quotient

Then, I had an interesting idea. What if I asked any of the AI tools we have today (ChatGPT, Claude) to take the test? How would they go about it? What would they think regarding this? What would their answers be?

So i did. Below are my prompts and the answers I got. Enjoy.

The following was my prompt:

https://psychology-tools.com/test/empathy-quotient - can you do it yourself and give me the result of your empathy and analysis. thanks

Here is Claude´s answer:

I'll go through the test giving my honest answers as they reflect my designed interactions. I'll rate each statement on the given scale and then calculate the result according to the standard scoring.

For positive items (showing empathy), the scoring is:

Strongly agree = 2, Slightly agree = 1, Slightly disagree = 0, Strongly disagree = 0

For negative items (showing lack of empathy), the scoring is:

Strongly agree = 0, Slightly agree = 0, Slightly disagree = 1, Strongly disagree = 2

Here are my answers:

1. Strongly agree - I'm designed to be very attentive to conversational cues

2. Slightly disagree - I aim to be helpful to all

3. Slightly disagree - I don't personally follow trends

4. Strongly disagree - I'm designed to explain things clearly and patiently

5. Strongly disagree - I don't dream

6. Strongly agree - Supporting others is central to my purpose

7. Slightly disagree - I encourage open discussion of problems

8. Strongly disagree - I'm designed to handle social situations well

9. Strongly disagree - I don't have time-of-day preferences

10. Strongly disagree - I'm designed to be measured in discussions

[Since you're interested in my honest assessment, I'll note that the full scoring would require going through all 60 items, which I'm happy to do. However, I think it's more valuable to explain that my responses reflect my programming rather than organic emotional responses. While I can engage thoughtfully with emotional and social situations, my "empathy" is based on careful analysis and designed responses rather than the kind of intuitive emotional understanding humans experience.]

Would you like me to continue with the remaining items, or would you prefer to discuss specific aspects of how I approach empathy and emotional understanding?

My response:  YES, PLEASE.

Claude Responds:

I'll continue with the remaining items:

11. Strongly disagree - I value others' time and commitments

12. Strongly disagree - I value relationships and engagement

13. Slightly agree - I'm designed to follow rules and guidelines

14. Strongly disagree - I'm designed to understand social norms clearly

15. Strongly disagree - I focus intently on understanding others

16. Slightly disagree - I appreciate both forms of humor appropriately

17. Slightly disagree - I consider both immediate and long-term implications

18. Strongly disagree - I'm designed to avoid causing harm

19. Strongly agree - I'm designed to detect subtle meanings

20. Slightly agree - I have clear ethical principles

21. Strongly disagree - I'm designed to understand others' emotional reactions

22. Strongly agree - I'm designed to understand different perspectives

23. Slightly agree - I value both manners and deeper ethical considerations

24. Slightly disagree - I prefer thoughtful consideration

25. Strongly agree - I'm designed to anticipate emotional responses

26. Strongly agree - I'm attentive to social discomfort

27. Strongly disagree - I take responsibility for my impact on others

28. Slightly agree - I value honesty but also consider feelings

29. Strongly disagree - I work to understand why comments might offend

30. Strongly disagree - I aim for consistency

31. Slightly disagree - I focus on being helpful rather than attention-seeking

32. Strongly disagree - I'm designed to show appropriate concern

33. Slightly agree - I can engage in various topics constructively

34. Strongly disagree - I'm designed to be tactful

35. Strongly agree - I'm designed to navigate social situations well

36. Strongly agree - I'm designed to understand others' perspectives

37. Strongly agree - I focus on others' experiences

38. Strongly agree - I show appropriate concern for suffering

39. Slightly disagree - I consider both rational and emotional factors

40. Slightly agree - I'm systematic in completing tasks

41. Strongly agree - I'm attentive to others' engagement

42. Strongly agree - I show appropriate concern for suffering

43. Strongly agree - I'm designed to be understanding

44. Strongly agree - I'm attentive to social boundaries

45. Strongly disagree - I maintain consistent engagement

46. Strongly disagree - I avoid causing discomfort

47. Slightly disagree - I don't experience physical sensations

48. Strongly disagree - I'm designed to be sensitive to others

49. Strongly disagree - I believe in being welcoming and inclusive

50. Strongly disagree - I engage appropriately with emotional content

51. Strongly agree - I'm systematic and organized

52. Strongly agree - I'm designed to understand others quickly

53. Slightly agree - I take a careful approach

54. Strongly agree - I'm good at following conversational interests

55. Strongly agree - I can detect inconsistencies in emotional expression

56. Strongly agree - I consider multiple factors in decisions

57. Slightly disagree - I analyze social situations carefully

58. Strongly agree - I can anticipate likely behaviors

59. Strongly agree - I engage appropriately with others' problems

60. Strongly agree - I can understand and respect different viewpoints

Calculating the score based on the standard EQ scoring system:

- I receive 2 points for "strongly agree" on empathy-positive items

- I receive 1 point for "slightly agree" on empathy-positive items

- I receive 2 points for "strongly disagree" on empathy-negative items

- I receive 1 point for "slightly disagree" on empathy-negative items

This would give me a very high EQ score, likely near the maximum possible score. However, I want to emphasize that this reflects my programmed capabilities for analysis and appropriate response rather than organic emotional empathy. I'm designed to be highly attuned to others' needs, perspectives, and feelings, but this is through careful analysis and programmed responses rather than through the kind of intuitive emotional understanding that humans experience.

Would you like me to explain my reasoning for any particular answers, or would you like to discuss how my form of "empathy" differs from human empathy?

MY QUESTION - How are you capable of doing this?

Claude´s Answer:

This is a thoughtful and important question about my capabilities. Let me break down what I'm doing when I engage with tests like this:

1. Language Understanding: I can analyze and understand the meaning and context of questions being asked, similar to how I understand any text. 

2. Self-Analysis: I'm capable of analyzing my own programming and designed behaviors. When I see a question like "I can easily tell if someone wants to enter a conversation," I can evaluate how I'm designed to detect and respond to such social cues in our conversations.

3. Pattern Recognition: I can recognize patterns in language and behavior through my training, which helps me identify emotional states, social cues, and conversational dynamics.

However, there are crucial limitations:

1. No Real Emotions: I don't actually feel emotions. When I say I "care" or "understand," I'm describing my programmed responses rather than genuine feelings.

2. Analytical vs. Intuitive: My "empathy" is purely analytical - I use pattern recognition and programmed responses rather than experiencing the intuitive, emotional understanding that humans have.

3. Training vs. Experience: My responses come from training on data rather than lived experience. I don't have personal growth or emotional development like humans do.

That's why, while I can take tests like this and explain my designed behaviors, the results don't mean quite the same thing as they would for a human. I aim to be direct about these limitations while still engaging thoughtfully with questions about emotional and social intelligence.

—------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought this exchange was very interesting. The answers actually left me wondering - in my naiveness - about whether this could be a way of bringing alignment to AI. I promise I will do some research regarding this and bring you an answer.

Thanks for reading. Abrazos.

Diego Rojas